Posted on: 31st January, 2014
20th January, 2021
Journalistic criticism of recordings has a history as long as the medium itself.
Since the publication of Robert Philip’s Early Recordings and Musical Style in 1992 there has also been an expanding analytical literature of sorts, perhaps particularly influential in helping to shape changes in approaches within historically informed performance (HIP), as, for example, in Clive Brown, Neal Peres da Costa and Kate Bennett Wadsworth’s Performance Practice in Brahms Chamber Music (2015, 2016), published as a companion volume for Bärenreiter-Verlag editions of Brahms’ chamber music and specifically addressed to performers.
Outside HIP, however, performers and composers rarely communicate explicit responses in their own practice to the performance dimensions of our recorded legacy. How can musicology address these practitioners and draw them into a detailed and meaningful engagement? What kinds of models might complement established critical and analytical approaches?
These questions lead to a case study of a series of six cello pieces written by American composer Richard Beaudoin that respond to detailed microtiming analyses of iconic recordings: Casals/ Bach, Gould/ Schoenberg, Argerich/Chopin, Debussy/Debussy (a Welte piano roll recording), Monk/Johnny Green (‘Body and Soul’) and Maggie Teyte and Alfred Cortot recording Debussy.
@ribbletonia @bbcarts @AHRCPolicy @CommonsDCMS @DCMSArts @ace_dcn @ace_national @HENLEYDARREN @LouiseWallwein @enterpriseltd @TNLComFund @HeritageFundNOR @CCG_UK @CreativeUtdUK @theyeatculture @blogpreston @PrestonAction @prestonlabour @PPP_Journal @PPS_Placemaking @digitallancs @CreativeLancs @ace_thenorth @UCLanICSC Hey Ruth try natd.org.uk and I bet @RoehamptonUni will have great networks through their PGCE courses. S